Well… You went to such great lengths to write this. The hit piece that made you change your opinion about Jackson has been debunked thoroughly — the men starring in it have provably — and I mean *provably*- lied and the reasons behind the movie are merely financial. There’s no abuse here. Well, actually the only abused party here is Jackson — and his elderly mother and three kids, one of whom still a minor, Safechuck and Robson are trying to rob via the MJ Estate. There are so many proven lies, glaring inconsistencies, flat-out and severe omissions, astounding contradictions in the movie that an article as long as yours would not suffice.

Just for other readers who aren’t going to be swayed by your fanatic background of Jackson, here are the facts — evidence, court files, actual and official documentation and such — that the movie you decided to endorse does not (and cannot) provide.

Thorough research, with official files and resources at the bottom of each page: https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/the-leaving-neverland-files/

Full breakdown via Damien Shields, journalist and writer: http://www.damienshields.com/leaving-neverland-exposed-the-devil-is-in-the-detail/

Leaving Neverland — The Aftermath (documentary, theatrical version shown at the TCL Chinese Theater in Hollywood June 21st, 2019): https://youtu.be/2hkNPmpudpc

These are just some of the contents debunking the whole movie (documentaries are, quite frankly, something else).

In all honesty, I wish you some unbiased critical thinking. But I also hope you’ll never call again a Michael Jackson fan — because if a one-sided TV show with no contradictory, no evidence, no third parties, and starring two men who have already been thrown out of court twice since 2013 after presenting forged evidence in court or withholding evidence from the judge is enough for you to get swayed, you’re just the type of advocate Jackson doesn’t need.

- A person who used to believe Jackson was guilty